[Mariner]

” will continue to grow in scope until it is successfully challenged”

These is no way to challenge it while it’s happening.
As a practical matter, courts are closed.

And after the fact, “success” will be rare. There’s a long legal history supporting these laws and their enforcement. If anything the legality has been enhance with each new hysteria.

[glennaro]

Excellent points, Mariner. Goes to my early contention (which now doesn't appear quite so over-the-top) that without the legislative and judicial components of state governments operating, the executives are running amok with unbridled and unchecked power; that our Constitution, though perhaps not "suspended", is certainly not a consideration with the widely varying dictates at the state level.

(As an aside, as difficult as it is to acknowlege this, I must. Stepping back, I think Gavin Newsome of California is doing a reasonable job of balancing priorities with the restrictions associated with the virus, especially in contrast to the governors in some of the other states (e.g., New York; New Jersey; Michigan; Nevada; Oregon ... no surprise they're all Democrat/Leftists!)

Be well, my FRiend.