And now that you read the article did you see the references to "as of February 26th" and the statement that the article was published on February 28th?My response: “ I don’t know why anyone would find an issue that someone got a date wrong by two days”
Your current comment:
February 28th to March 26 is not equal to “two days”. It’s more than that. I think its actually more than 25 days. Is that relevant?You bounce off of the walls. If you wish to be understood you should collect your thoughts before you make the attempt.
I, as others have pointed out, would rather watch OANN proclaim that Elvis has come back to meet President Trump in the White House or hear OANN tell me that UFOs have landed on the lawn of the White House than listen to the lies and spin other so called "news networks" spew from their mouthpieces.
“And now that you read the article did you see the references to “as of February 26th” and the statement that the article was published on February 28th?”
That’s not an error. The data in the article is as of Feb 26th and the article was published two days later on Feb 28th.
That’s two facts both of which prove that the article does not Fauci’s “latest comments” as of March 26th.
Even if OAN didn’t read all the way to the bottom to see the publication date (Feb 28th), if they merely read the actual words of the article itself, they would have seen that it was reflecting the situation as of Feb 26th. Not March 26th.
Not sure how adding additional facts to provide definitive proof is “bouncing off walls” but actually now that you mention it that is psychologically how those (for example but not exclusively) on the left perceive facts that challenge their world view. A bit disorienting and then it leads them to their best defense, which is name calling and making up fake facts out of thin air. I got pretty good at calling them on it since they do it so often.