To: rktman
The data does not necessarily indicate what the advisors claim that it does. President Trumps’s hands were tied. This was a political calculation, not a decision based on the “science”. The “data” and the “modeling” have been as accurate as the modeling for global warming. We are a long ways from understanding whether anything the government has done has been worthwhile. That will take testing for antibodies in representative sample populations throughout the country... my guess is that studies that show we trashed the economy based on dubious "science" will never be funded unless someone believes it will help get rid of President Trump.
To: fireman15
It’s as if everyone in a position to make decision assumes that there is no risk associated with a completely collapsed economy. The risk associated with 20% - 30% unemployment vastly exceeds any risk associate with this virus. It also swings the door wide open to more and more permanent socialism.
22 posted on
03/30/2020 1:12:41 PM PDT by
tatown
To: fireman15
The data and the modeling have been as accurate as the modeling for global warming....
Exactly. If these 2 drs were advising me, I’d get a second opinion.
27 posted on
03/30/2020 1:25:03 PM PDT by
Ceebass
(judas, arnold, quisling, romney)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson