To: The_Media_never_lie
Also, if people go out in the wilderness and get lost, injured, or dead, they (or their heirs) will sue the Park Service for not stopping them. Under the tort theory of “Attractive Nuisance,” other people can be held liable for the existence of a location in which you can do something fatally stupid.
21 posted on
03/27/2020 8:30:35 AM PDT by
Tax-chick
(Scapegoating is a textbook coping mechanism.)
To: Tax-chick
Also, if people go out in the wilderness and get lost, injured, or dead, they (or their heirs) will sue the Park Service for not stopping them.Instead of posting notice of closing of the parks, post notice that no aid or rescue efforts will be made beginning date certain. Let visitors decide for themselves.
31 posted on
03/27/2020 8:35:55 AM PDT by
JimRed
(TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: Tax-chick
Also, if people go out in the wilderness and get lost, injured, or dead, they (or their heirs) will sue the Park Service for not stopping them. Under the tort theory of Attractive Nuisance, other people can be held liable for the existence of a location in which you can do something fatally stupid.
Maybe they should ban people from the GSMNP forever, because of the liability concerns. Also, the campers are predominately white people. Shouldn't there be a special wilderness area for black people, Asians etc. This is so discriminatory.
The government knows what is best; I am sure they will solve this problem and establish a wilderness area for minorities!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson