Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edwinland

“BUT not everyone is bad. Bayer recently gave the US Government 3,000,000 Chloroquine tablets of which 750,000 were sent to NYC. Novartis stated they have 50,000,000 doses on hand with another 80,000,000 doses to be ready by May. (according to the Conservative Treehouse)”

You are correct, however what I find absolutely frightening is that multiple Governors have mandated not using the malaria drugs for COVID-19, to now include 2 Republican governors.

Does anyone have clarity on WHY?

I look at all this from the view of what-if my kids get it. The drugs work, so why in God’s name would you ban it? It’s only a matter of time till the Progressive PA Governor follows the rest.


39 posted on 03/27/2020 10:04:04 AM PDT by mzimmpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: mzimmpa

>>You are correct, however what I find absolutely frightening is that multiple Governors have mandated not using the malaria drugs for COVID-19, to now include 2 Republican governors.

Does anyone have clarity on WHY?<<

I would read those orders carefully to see if they’re mainly intended to stop hoarding, but not discourage their use in CoVid-19 patients.

If they are intended to discourage use, well, if the drug turns out to be the answer, their political careers should be over at least.


46 posted on 03/27/2020 10:54:11 AM PDT by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: mzimmpa
I can't imagine a doctor would withhold a life-saving treatment with an available, FDA-approved drug because a non-medically qualified state official issued an order regarding one specific disease.

Nor can I imagine a Governor would assume responsibility for dictating medical treatment decisions for life-threatened patients, against the judgement of the treating doctors.

The first is prima facie malpractice, the second is manslaughter at the least.

Since the real story can't possibly be this, it must be something else. I do remember reading that the order for one state, I forget which, was not intended to apply to patients who were hospitalized. Don't know if that's precisely accurate because it would make more sense to limit the drug to patients who are symptomatic and diagnosed with Wuhan, in hopes of preventing the need for hospitalization.

49 posted on 03/29/2020 5:14:36 AM PDT by JustaTech (A mind is a terrible thing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson