Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Syncro
Do you always use false premises to send an ad hominid attack?

It’s not unconstitutional.

Don’t be taken in so easily.

On February 12, 1998, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia declared the 1996 Line Item Veto Act unconstitutional, and the Clinton administration appealed the decision to the Supreme Court.

In a 6-3 ruling issued on June 25, 1998, the Supreme Court, in the case of Clinton v. City of New York upheld the District Court's decision, overturning the 1996 Line Item Veto Act as a violation of the "Presentment Clause," (Article I, Section 7), of the U.S. Constitution.

You can blow it out your ass.

173 posted on 03/26/2020 5:25:41 PM PDT by onona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies ]


To: Syncro
And it's Ad hominem you ignorant inciter.
175 posted on 03/26/2020 5:28:58 PM PDT by onona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: Syncro
And it's Ad hominem you ignorant inciter.
176 posted on 03/26/2020 5:28:59 PM PDT by onona
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

To: onona

Ha ha settle down.

All supreme court decisions are NOT Constitunal.

Many are agenda driven

I can show you in the Constitution where it proves that abortion is NOT supported by the Constitution.

Yet you think it is “settled law”

An example of ‘say something over and over again and everybody will think that it is true’


179 posted on 03/26/2020 5:31:34 PM PDT by Syncro (Facts is Facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson