1 posted on
03/25/2020 6:52:12 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
Probably need to fire off a few just to make sure the system works. How far is Wuhan exactly? /s
2 posted on
03/25/2020 7:01:06 PM PDT by
CatOwner
To: Olog-hai
But the Russian nukes in Kaliningrad are widely accepted and not controversial, right?
3 posted on
03/25/2020 7:13:03 PM PDT by
rfp1234
(Democratus Partitus Delendus Est)
To: Olog-hai
Peace keeping to be used when the glass is broken. Germany can suck it. They still lost the war.
5 posted on
03/25/2020 7:23:24 PM PDT by
shanover
(...To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them.-S.Adams)
To: Olog-hai
The specter of bioweapons use, and the potential stealth that could conceal their use, raises the question of ‘What constitutes mutually assured destruction in the context of bioweapons?”. Mutually assured destruction is a major factor that has kept nukes from being used, but how does this concept apply to bioweapons?
At present, the potential to respond to bioweapons with nukes is a possible deterrent, and the upgrading of our nuclear capacity is thus very important. I hate that the world runs this way, but it often does, and we need to protect our families and ourselves.
To: Olog-hai
I wonder if they are B-61’s?
Heh, those things always looked like Buck Rogers weapons to me. All silver with fins that looked like they were designed back in the late fifties...
7 posted on
03/25/2020 7:25:34 PM PDT by
rlmorel
(The Coronavirus itself will not burn down humanity. But we may burn ourselves down to be rid of it.)
To: Olog-hai
LOL, never mind...I just read the article and they are B-61’s.
8 posted on
03/25/2020 7:26:11 PM PDT by
rlmorel
(The Coronavirus itself will not burn down humanity. But we may burn ourselves down to be rid of it.)
To: Olog-hai
I'm always scratching my head in amazement how we keep insisting on smaller warheads while our enemies are going supersized.
Its like the top brass keep accepting the policy that we can mouse-click them into submission, while they will devastate our entire population with just a few huge warheads.
9 posted on
03/25/2020 7:28:31 PM PDT by
prophetic
(Trump is today's DANIEL. Shut the mouth of lions Lord, let his enemies be the Cat Food instead.)
To: Olog-hai
I had seen the delivery technique for this type of bomb practiced at sea with a MK84 (instead of a nuclear weapon) being lobbed from an A-7 Corsair-
This video shows it pretty well
10 posted on
03/25/2020 7:39:54 PM PDT by
rlmorel
(The Coronavirus itself will not burn down humanity. But we may burn ourselves down to be rid of it.)
To: Olog-hai
Sigh...Every ten-twenty years or so we must re-educate a new generation of snowflakes as to why nuclear weapons are still necessary to counter those possessed by potential adversaries. Don’t they learn this stuff in school? Dumb question, I know. They teach them unilateral disarmament assuming that good will will make them reciprocate.
11 posted on
03/25/2020 7:41:02 PM PDT by
vigilence
(Vigilence)
To: Olog-hai
Remember when those Deusche-bags threw bags of blood at our bombers in the 1980s to protest the Reagan INF nuke policy that brought the Soviets to their knees?
To: Olog-hai
Our governments position should be very simple...if the nukes go, we all go.
To: Olog-hai
This fricking author wants to become a “writer.”
JUST TELL ME THE DMND FACTS, don’t embellish this crap with you flowery stinking words.
24 posted on
03/26/2020 1:46:36 AM PDT by
RArtfulogerDodger
(peace, Love, and Joy To All, Especially Obama and Democrats)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson