There will be ample supplies of the drug
*******************
There will be ample supplies once production gets cranked up but in the short term maybe a shortage is a real possibility?
And he would counter the argument about critically ill CV patients needing the drug by saying it hasn’t been proven effective for CV. It may be a cynical argument, but that’s what he’d say.
I suspect his root motivation is spiteful TDS but I’m just wargaming his possible arguments here.
BTW, where was protecting existing users given as a justification? I don’t see it in the AP report.
“And he would counter the argument about critically ill CV patients needing the drug by saying it hasnt been proven effective for CV.”
______
He already did =>
“Sisolak said in a statement that theres no consensus among experts or Nevada doctors that the drugs can treat people with COVID-19.”
See the link in post 52 of this thread.