Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-Insider Trading Laws Are About Envy, Not What’s Good for the Country
Townhall.com ^ | March 20, 2020 | Gavin Wax

Posted on 03/22/2020 9:47:15 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Kaslin

This article is total tripe, and if the stock market ran that way, without insider trading laws, very few busy hardworking people would be in the market. As such, most companies would be capitalized less, and our economy would be a lot smaller.

Further, you can’t be a ‘producer’ in society, and at the same time have the amount of ‘extra’ time on your hands to compete with day traders and insiders with regards ‘information’ gathering and ‘playing the game’

This coronavirus pandemic is making some things very apparent in the world, including the relative greater importance of truck drivers, warehouse workers, farmers and other food providers, health care workers, and manufacturing facilities and the people who make them work - vs Hollywood, talking heads in the media, know nothing academics, and the majority of those pinheads who populate public office.

Someone please explain how anything the political establishment has done over the past 30 years has made us safer and stronger in the face of crises like the one we are now in? As such, what right do they have to enrich themselves at our expense? There’s no difference between a politician using insider information to enrich themselves vs a drug dealer. None. They are both self-serving selfish mercenaries.


21 posted on 03/22/2020 10:18:36 AM PDT by neverevergiveup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

But the thing is something a Senator says can influence the markets in a way that few people can. They should be restricted from holding stock.


22 posted on 03/22/2020 10:20:31 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Breach of trust defines CONgress.
23 posted on 03/22/2020 10:22:26 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The article that broke this noted that they did this after receiving a confidential briefing. If they had been executives at a company that sat through a confidential briefing that informed them that their profits would plummet and likely be accompanied by a big drop in the stock price and they dumped their stock, the FTC would prosecute them. Seems open and shut to me.
24 posted on 03/22/2020 10:22:46 AM PDT by RetiredScientist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Karliner

It’s a Big Club, and You Ain’t In It!


25 posted on 03/22/2020 10:23:14 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

It isn’t. It was a obvious play. I had plenty of puts against the spy around the same time. This isn’t insider trading.


26 posted on 03/22/2020 10:24:21 AM PDT by Theoria (I should never have surrendered. I should have fought until I was the last man alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Either it should be legal for everyone or illegal for everyone. Congress should NEVER be exempt from the crap laws that they foist upon us.


27 posted on 03/22/2020 10:25:49 AM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Ugh. The “free market” relies on free information and the free exchange of goods. Using insider information deprives any relying on a free market (or what we try to pass off as a “free market”) from fair access.

Why are outlier loony opinions given such prominent exposure nowadays?

28 posted on 03/22/2020 10:28:08 AM PDT by Fido969 (In!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Selling of stock you know is gonna tank, should be charged under fraud laws the same way a manufacturer/retailer selling defective products can be liable. But buying stock you know is gonna get a big boost soon? how does that hurt anyone? When it comes to CongressCritters, though, they should be banned from anything related. They don;t only have insider knowledge, they make the laws that affect these business and can indirectly force stock prices for certain companies to go up or down. That should be the most illegal thing out of all of this!
29 posted on 03/22/2020 10:28:21 AM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Yes — that’s a whole different story. If I served in Congress I would not own securities in individual companies. I might even just limit my investments to broad index funds.


30 posted on 03/22/2020 10:29:41 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Oh, but it's hard to live by the rules; I never could and still never do.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
no money stolen

Does the author have even a BASIC understanding of mathematics?
31 posted on 03/22/2020 10:30:52 AM PDT by HalfIrish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

But even index funds can be influenced.

I say all Congress people should divest of all investments. Too many politicians are in it for the profit as it is.


32 posted on 03/22/2020 10:31:23 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Bonemaker

This Gavin wax dirtbag is obviously involved in this crap. He belongs in prison or at the end of a rope.


33 posted on 03/22/2020 10:34:58 AM PDT by Okeydoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Essentially, the idea of making insider trading into a crime rests on the principle that information is a human right, that all market players have a right to the same information at the same time. It’s a utopian, communist notion that can’t work.

Without restrictions on insider trading, no one but insiders would invest in these companies. No companies would be able to sell equity because no one but the insiders would profit from it.

34 posted on 03/22/2020 10:35:15 AM PDT by Ronaldus Magnus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverevergiveup

Only Townhall would publish this garbage


35 posted on 03/22/2020 10:35:56 AM PDT by Okeydoker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RetiredScientist

People are missing the elephant in the room and concentrating on the sale of the stocks. The Senate and House Intelligence committees were briefed about the seriousness of the coming viral outbreak. All of the members of the Senate and House should have put their energies and concern on the coming Wuhan Virus from China if it were so serious. Nothing happened. Were they negligent, incompetent, traitorous, ignorant or distracted from the problem headed our way? It appears to me that our self serving representatives have a larger problem than insider trading and have failed the citizens of the US.


36 posted on 03/22/2020 10:37:06 AM PDT by vetvetdoug
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well, no. Bogus proposition.


37 posted on 03/22/2020 10:38:07 AM PDT by gogeo (The left prides themselves on being tolerant, but they can't even be civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
The author raises some excellent points here, but the underlying premise is wrong. Laws against insider trading aren’t passed because of envy. They’re aimed at protecting the ability of these companies to publicly trade their shares — because nobody would invest in the stock market if they thought it was rigged against them.

Clearly not the case.

Lots of people trade in the stock market, even though they believe it is rigged against them.

38 posted on 03/22/2020 10:38:49 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: datricker
i say we hang them

There is no chance any of them will face prison time. The worst they are facing is a fine.

39 posted on 03/22/2020 10:52:35 AM PDT by Kazan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Kazan

They are in the Big Club, and we’re not.


40 posted on 03/22/2020 10:53:39 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson