Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Utah's six women senators walked off the floor in protest of abortion ultrasound bill
Fox 13 ^ | March 11, 2020 | Ben Winslow

Posted on 03/11/2020 6:21:43 PM PDT by Morgana

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
"Republican and Democrat, the female senators did not vote on House Bill 364. The bill was passed by men on a 16-7 vote."

Utah FReepers you remember this next election!!!

1 posted on 03/11/2020 6:21:43 PM PDT by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Repeal 19


2 posted on 03/11/2020 6:24:57 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Wow.


3 posted on 03/11/2020 6:26:01 PM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Only land owners should be allowed to vote. Period.


4 posted on 03/11/2020 6:26:06 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Get your houses in order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

What is so damn invasive about an ultra sound?

Pro-Life my ass. Primary all of them.


5 posted on 03/11/2020 6:28:59 PM PDT by Flavious_Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

I’d be inclined to go with landowners who have passed some sort of test and have dependents for the state Senate, and people with dependents who pay more in taxes than they receive from the government in benefits for the state House, but who am I to judge?


6 posted on 03/11/2020 6:29:06 PM PDT by Hieronymus ("I shall drink--to the Pope, if you please,-still, t Conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Flavious_Maximus

I’d settle for an ultrasound. If it has to be a transvaginal ultrasound, which seems to be the case from the article, ‘d agree with the women.


7 posted on 03/11/2020 6:31:15 PM PDT by Hieronymus ("I shall drink--to the Pope, if you please,-still, t Conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

“Six Utah Female Senators Support Murdering Babies” would be a more accurate headline.


8 posted on 03/11/2020 6:32:50 PM PDT by Tudorfly (All things are possible within the will of God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

This is an example why I’m reluctant to vote for women. Not all but the vast majority bond with their ‘sisters’ right or wrong. These nincompoops would deny a safe, diagnostic medical scanner such as widely used ultrasound is a travesty.


9 posted on 03/11/2020 6:33:01 PM PDT by tflabo (Truth or tyranny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Walking kill holes.


10 posted on 03/11/2020 6:34:36 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

YAWN

In other news, Utah mountains are snow covered...


11 posted on 03/11/2020 6:42:37 PM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

What are they afraid of?
Proof of life?


12 posted on 03/11/2020 6:44:04 PM PDT by silverleaf (Remember kids: You can vote your way into communism, but you have to shoot your way out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I want these harridans to explain to me a non-invasive abortion procedure.


13 posted on 03/11/2020 6:47:12 PM PDT by lastchance (Credo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

Bare foot and pregnant worked for thousands of years. .....just something to think about. ...


14 posted on 03/11/2020 6:48:48 PM PDT by redshawk ( I want my red balloon. ( https://youtu.be/V12H2mteniE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Good. I echo the repeal19


15 posted on 03/11/2020 6:54:08 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not Averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hieronymus

I’d be interested on some discussion on why a pre-abortion transvaginal ultrasond would be objecionable, seeing that the abortion itself is invasive and transvaginal... and the ultrasound is 100% non-risk while the abortion is quite the opposite...


16 posted on 03/11/2020 6:58:40 PM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: samadams2000

I’m with you 110%.


17 posted on 03/11/2020 7:02:24 PM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o

I think that a regular non-transvaginal ultrasound should suffice to make the point, and consequently think that on the grounds of being minimally invasive, that should suffice—if the woman wants a transvaginal one, she should be able to opt for it instead.

While I think that this can be discussed, I think that most of the people on the thread are missing the point concerning what is being required.


18 posted on 03/11/2020 7:03:55 PM PDT by Hieronymus ("I shall drink--to the Pope, if you please,-still, t Conscience first, and to the Pope afterwards.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

They don’t want the girls having the abortions to see the babies they are killing. Those women won’t get their campaign contributions from planned parenthood if they don’t do whatever pp asks of them.


19 posted on 03/11/2020 7:05:56 PM PDT by Linda Frances (Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: redshawk

“Bare foot and pregnant worked for thousands of years. .....just something to think about. ...”

And it will again. They’ll be hispanic, or Muslim, or something else, but they won’t be our descendents.


20 posted on 03/11/2020 7:05:58 PM PDT by Empire_of_Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson