Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: where's_the_Outrage?

This number changes almost yearly and is nothing but a scare tactic for the libs to raise taxes.

That said I thiunk the ceiling for contributions ought to be lifted so workers pay on all the earn from their employment. The maximum payment should also be increased so high earners are not penalized.

It is also time for a private self funded retirement plan for those who want to opt out of SS entirely.


7 posted on 03/09/2020 9:56:24 AM PDT by billyboy15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: billyboy15
"... so workers pay on all the earn from their employment. "

Wouldn't that entitle the higher paid workers to increased benefits? Or are you in favor of making the program even more progressive?

I would support across the board benefit cuts until the program vanishes. A two percent cut from present benefit amounts would eliminate Social Security in fifty years. Such a time period would allow people time to adjust. Payments into the system would decrease as soon as the program is at break-even.

27 posted on 03/09/2020 10:19:07 AM PDT by William Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: billyboy15
That said I thiunk the ceiling for contributions ought to be lifted so workers pay on all the earn from their employment.

There is a ceiling on "contributions" because there is a ceiling on benefits. After that is purely wealth redistribution.

96 posted on 03/09/2020 7:12:22 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson