Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Social Security's catch-22 is bad news for retirees
The Motley Fool ^ | March 7, 2020 | Sean Williams

Posted on 03/09/2020 9:49:19 AM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last
To: DEPcom

Years ago, the state of NC tried to take away a retirement promise they made to employees. What I remember was that a retired state Judge sued the state: the retirees won!

https://www.ncdor.gov/taxes-forms/individual-income-tax/bailey-decision-concerning-federal-state-and-local-retirement-benefits

My point is that if the gov’t makes a promise, the gov’t has to keep it.


81 posted on 03/09/2020 11:47:21 AM PDT by ncpatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: null and void

LOL! You’re right on those ages.

Although the USSC says Social security payments are not a right, doing this would suicidal, in more ways than one, for the politicians.


82 posted on 03/09/2020 11:53:27 AM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: bkopto

Yup, and the longer they remember that, the longer they will live.


83 posted on 03/09/2020 11:55:16 AM PDT by null and void (By the pricking of my lungs, Something wicked this way comes ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: CurlyDave
I want the benefit I was promised.

See post 65 above FYI.

84 posted on 03/09/2020 11:55:47 AM PDT by bkopto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster

Ditto.

Banking on SS, as your only income to live on in retirement, is NOT a retirement plan.


85 posted on 03/09/2020 11:58:33 AM PDT by Jane Long (Praise God, from whom ALL blessings flow.cuase)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

“In Social Security’s case, no matter what unilateral proposal is made to resolve the program’s cash shortfall over the long term (defined as the next 75 years), benefit cuts for retired workers seem to be a given.”

There are several fixes to the Social Security program that would ensure solvency for at least the next 80 years. Here is a discussion of some of them:

https://www.aarp.org/work/social-security/info-05-2012/future-of-social-security-proposals.html


86 posted on 03/09/2020 12:07:28 PM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bkopto
...See post 65 above FYI...

I know all about the SC decision that SS is not a promise.

BUT if an annuity company said the things that government has said about SS and then tried to reneg on the deal their officers would be in prison.

87 posted on 03/09/2020 12:40:08 PM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

You mean hit harder. They already pay taxes on the “benefit” and pay much higher medicare premiums.

They will be hit harder because they are a small voting group and just don’t matter politically. Same as always, fix the target and destroy it.

We never do what is rational. Never.


88 posted on 03/09/2020 12:40:13 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (We are governed by the consent of the governed and we are fools for allowing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IamConservative

Again.

The best thing to do would be to phase it out completely. Pay those who paid in fully fully, pay those who paid in half half and so forth but end it. Won’t do that. odorko turned it into another welfare program with disability payments.

We’re fukt’d.


89 posted on 03/09/2020 12:43:15 PM PDT by Sequoyah101 (We are governed by the consent of the governed and we are fools for allowing it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

Politicians do not care about debt. Someone else will have to deal with it.


90 posted on 03/09/2020 1:47:23 PM PDT by ActresponsiblyinVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Macoozie

Your confusing Social Security Disability Insurance with Supplemental Security Income. They are two different programs but both managed by the Social Security Administration.

Social Security Disability Insurance(SSDI) is paid from the social security tax and the only way a child can draw from it is if they were disabled before age 18 and they have a parent who is currently disabled or deceased and paid enough into the system.

Supplemental Security Income(SSI) is paid from the general fund and is for adults who are disabled and haven’t paid enough into Social Security to be eligible for benefits or a disabled child who’s parent(s) fall below certain income and resource guidelines. It is a much smaller amount than the average Social Security Disability payment.


91 posted on 03/09/2020 2:35:48 PM PDT by OIFVeteran ( "Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable!" Daniel Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?
In Social Security's case, no matter what unilateral proposal is made to resolve the program's cash shortfall over the long term (defined as the next 75 years), benefit cuts for retired workers seem to be a given.

Well here's a solution that doesn't cut benefits:

Immediate TARP-style bailout of SS. Everyone 60 or older stays in the current system, and is funded appropriately. Everyone else is paid out whatever their current account standing is at, with the option to roll it straight into a 401k or IRA, tax-free.

SS is eliminated - no more taxes, no more anything except the old people who were grandfathered in. Over time it'll go away as old folks die off.

FedGov gets out of the retirement business (except for employees as appropriate), since nothing in the Constitution gives FedGov the power to do anything like social security or a 401k. The States are free to set up their own public SS/401k program if they feel that their populace needs to have a government-ran retirement program. Or people can do their business' 401k, or their own personal IRAs.

And, EVERYONE gets a HUGE boost to their incomes, considering SS taxes is something like 7%. Then, considering their employers are saving an additional 7% on labor, many companies will likely give an across-the-board raise of up to 7%!
92 posted on 03/09/2020 5:07:52 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

Great plan.
Where does all the money come from?
It’s not like it exists in some actual form today.


93 posted on 03/09/2020 5:10:11 PM PDT by nascarnation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: nascarnation
Great plan.
Where does all the money come from?
It’s not like it exists in some actual form today.


And therein lies the rub.

As much as I hate spending money that's not accounted for like TARP, something like this justifies, I think, not having the offsetting income. Mainly because SS is going to start getting far into the red, and a small bailout now (taxpayer $$) is much better than continuous, growing, expenditures down the road (taxpayer $$$$$$$$). We certainly can cut spending elsewhere for this, but whether we do or we don't, it would still save $$ compared to what SS is going to end up doing.
94 posted on 03/09/2020 6:33:24 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

I’ve got a better plan. Get rid of the social security tax income cap(currently set at $132,900) and add a maximum benefit amount. This would get social security over the baby boomer hump and keep it solvent for future generations.


95 posted on 03/09/2020 6:51:11 PM PDT by OIFVeteran ( "Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable!" Daniel Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: billyboy15
That said I thiunk the ceiling for contributions ought to be lifted so workers pay on all the earn from their employment.

There is a ceiling on "contributions" because there is a ceiling on benefits. After that is purely wealth redistribution.

96 posted on 03/09/2020 7:12:22 PM PDT by MileHi (Liberalism is an ideology of parasites, hypocrites, grievance mongers, victims, and control freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OIFVeteran
I’ve got a better plan. Get rid of the social security tax income cap(currently set at $132,900) and add a maximum benefit amount. This would get social security over the baby boomer hump and keep it solvent for future generations.

Except that
A) That keeps a FedGov program running that has absolutely no Constitutional basis; and
B) Goes even further Democrat in taxing the rich and giving to the poor.
97 posted on 03/09/2020 8:55:51 PM PDT by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10

SS is NOT about retirement income!

It is about CONTROL!

Can’t have you deplorables out there making your own investment/savings/retirement plans, can we now?


98 posted on 03/09/2020 9:19:10 PM PDT by Taxman ((We will never be a truly FRee people so long as we have the income tax and the IRS!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dilbert San Diego

If we play our cards right, there will never be another Democrat President!


99 posted on 03/09/2020 9:20:43 PM PDT by Taxman ((We will never be a truly FRee people so long as we have the income tax and the IRS!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

Actually the supreme court has ruled that it is a tax under the 16th amendment and therefore constitutional.

The government taxes for all types of programs. Hell, the military protects everyone, even Americans who have never paid a dime in taxes. At least with Social Security you, or your spouse or parent, has to pay into the system.

I use to be a get rid of Social Security person too. After much research (prompted by a buddy that’s also an Army Retiree and got hired by Social Security) I’ve come to the realization that Social Security has kept many millions of American out of poverty.

Here’s the reality. Now that we have switched from an agrarian to an industrial to service economy there are three options for society when dealing with out retirees and disabled.

1)Let them eat cake-you didn’t prepare for retirement or plan for the possibility of a disability then too bad so sad. Problem with this is that the American people will never go for it. You put a grandma on the tv that’s living in a cardboard box and a huge majority of Americans are going to demand something be done.

2)A welfare program for those who didn’t plan for retirement or become disabled. With this there is a final safety net but we are still paying for it and the government is going to be more involved because they want to make sure this people are truly needy.

3)A program where we pay in together and we can then get some income from when needed. This allows Americans independence(unlike a welfare program there is no constant checking on if your eligible) and we all have skin in the game because you have to contribute to be able to draw.

I see it as any other service that government provides, like the military, fire, or police.


100 posted on 03/10/2020 4:56:42 AM PDT by OIFVeteran ( "Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable!" Daniel Webster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-106 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson