[redfreedom]

The parts I do not like here are “insiders tell The Post.” and “the source”.

Apparently there is an unnamed media whore that loves to tell. The problem is reliability. This crap should not be published unless “the source” is reliable. And if an insider did do this, he should be made an outsider in short order.

[Leep]

Didn’t journalist have to have more than one source before they would print the story?

[Lakeside Granny]

The parts I do not like here are “insiders tell The Post.” and “the source”.

Just maybe, as a parting gift, Mulvaney told someone who was under suspicion as a leaker this story.

Let's see who else might exit quickly.

[billyboy15]

“Apparently there is an unnamed media whore that loves to tell.”

And perhaps there is no one and this is entirely made up.

[Dave W]

Oh brother. There have been stories for 6 months if not more on how Trump was unhappy with Mulvaney. Stories on how Trump bypassed him or did not include him on some meetings. There was a reason why Trump never changed his title of Temp Chief of Staff.

Gee, there were stories from anonymous sources from last fall that said Trump wanted Meadows as his Chief of Staff.

Interesting how some people sour at the words anonymous sources, but believe every syllable from someone named "Q".