Posted on 03/06/2020 1:28:20 PM PST by SeekAndFind
It failed because Bernie was hogging her lane and there wasn’t enough oxygen for two loonies on the left. If Sanders cardiacs out she would easily be going toe to toe with Biden.
This left her with a base of educated suburban woman. Which is a key component for the general election, but not sufficient to get you above water in the Dem primary.
Really the headline should be “Would fauxcahontas have even made it to Super Tuesday if she wasn’t a woman? (because she’d be polling 3%)
We took a gander at her gender, and goosed her.
She was promising “deep structural changes to the United States” without really saying what those were. Being wary of that is not misogyny.
No. Her mouth.
The dogs don’t like the dog food.
People don’t like liars.
It failed because Democrats are sexist misogynists. Democrats are the only ones who voted in the Primaries, so clearly Democrats hate women.
All of the above. Amazing she got as far as she did.
Did Bloomberg, Buttijeg, Beto, Steyer, Yang fail because of their weewee?
I believe her “unlikeability factor” was far more the cause than does the author.
People do not vote for people they don’t like, just ask Michael Bloomberg.
Perhaps they didn’t believe in what Lieawatha believes, or aren’t really sure what she does believe because she changes her stories so much.
First, Leftist dogma is 95% pure BS, a fact which some people on the Rat side are waking up to. . . and she delivered it in a condescending, annoying manner.
On top of that, she was an obvious phony.
I believe the candidate she revealed herself to be just might cause her to get beaten in her next Senate race.
She failed because she was and is a pandering fool who will do or say anything to win.
She should’ve never been in the body politic in the first place, THE LYING POS. It would save us a lot of $ and BS.
On the minus side, she has an authenticity problem, having falsely claimed to be part Indian Injun, among other lies. She also waffled on the key issue of health insurance. In addition, in spite of her best efforts to take on a “down home” persona, she undoubtedly is a member of the elite delusional self-important establishment.
That's a little better. Never, ever compliment a Rat, even if it is deserved.
Among other factors, she told too many lies, crazy lies, lies that could easily be exposed.
The “Patsy Schroeder” effect-— creates harridans with screeching looney voices and points of view, along with nearly continuous lying about their background, and who and what they actually believe, depending on who is asking.
No one 1.) believes her or 2.) would trust her as a CIC or even a VP and 3.) did I say she lies... a lot? People can sense this and observe it unless they are complete fruit loops, or paid off.
She’ll show up again somewhere... count on it. Squawks-a hontas shall pitch new tepee after she cleans it of the deposits of crapola, everywhere.
no... it failed because she is a dumb ass....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.