[Oldeconomybuyer]

[Savage Beast]

Did she re-write the bill to render it evisceratable? Or did she base her opinion on foreign law?

[Clean_Sweep]

Sure as he’ll isn’t safer for the baby.

[Repealthe17thAmendment]

Not for the baby.

[lastchance]

Senile old goat.

[Vigilanteman]

I do not know about Louisiana, but mid-wives need hospital admission privileges to get licensed in many states, including where my grandsons were born. It is a common sense requirement for "just in case" scenarios.

[ktw]

If the first-trimester abortion is ‘far-safer than childbirth’. Then the law makers should pass a law “to protect all women” that all women that are pregnant, WILL have a abortion within the first trimester! Than have a child thru childbirth!

[Amendment10]

"Ruth Bader Ginsburg says first-trimester abortion is 'far-safer than childbirth' while eviscerating controversial Louisiana bill"

FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Regarding the politically correct murder of unborn children, and with all due respect to the family and supporters of the late Terri Schiavo, please consider the following.

Just like the states have never amended the Constitution to give the feds the express power to dictate policy for constitutionally unchecked, 10th Amendment (10A)-protected life and death issues like euthanasia, the Supreme Court appropriately refusing to hear Terri’s case imo, the pro-abortion, state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices that wrongly decided Roe v. Wade (Roe) against the states likewise should have refused to hear Roe imo. After all, neither have the states amended the Constitution to expressly give the feds the specific power to dictate policy regarding the murder unborn children.

Misguided, activist justices move the goal posts concerning 10A-protected life and death issues probably to help keep corrupt, post-17th Amendment ratification desperate Democrats and RINOs in power imo.

Remember in November!

MAGA, now KAG! (Keep America Great!)

Supporting PDJT with a new patriot Congress that will promise to fully support his already excellent work for MAGA will effectively give fast-working Trump a third term in office imo.

[Dave Wright]

I don’t see how Ginsburg’s medical assessment of risk is relevant to the constitutionality of the law itself. State governments are empowered to establish safety and liability issues for their medical facilities. There is nothing in this act that constrains or involves interstate commerce. The act does not violate or involve any of the issues raised by Roe or other precedents.

If the act does not violate the Constitution is should stand.

[bwest]

Time for her to take a (dirt) nap.

[Sacajaweau]

First of all...That’s a stupid statement. Secondly, this is about deliberately and with malice....killing a baby in the womb....not simply about safety.

[Da Coyote]

Summary: She’s a dumbass.

[UnwashedPeasant]

"safer than childbirth."

Not safer for the baby.

[pangaea6]

Certainly not safer for the child! I wish one of our justices would have spoken up and said that. Where is Scalia when we need him??

[Getready]

Abortion aint safe for the baby. Ideology causes blindness. It will be much safer for babies when she is off the supreme court.

[Stravinsky]

Evil, Marxist witch

[dfwgator]

It certainly isn’t “safer” for the child.

[fella]

Every successful abortion results in at least one death.

[Phillyred]

Safer for who?

[Mastador1]

Communist, Lawyer and now doctor too! Who doesn’t go to Supreme Court justuss’s to get their medical advice?

[clearcarbon]

"'If the woman has a problem, it will be her local hospital that she will need to go to for the care, not something 30 miles from the clinic, which does not have a necessary relationship to where she lives,' she said. "

If you like your doctor you can keep your doctor?