p
Sweet!!
Now.........
Can WE have some INDICTMENTS, Please?
Ho hum. More chum for the Conservative masses. Another, “Look, a squirrel!” misdirection. How ‘bout we dial up some of those indictments we have been promised?
Still nothing on Hillary, or Clapper, or Comey, or Brennan, or Strzok, or Page, or any of the countless criminals you have been promising would get close review. Still bupkiss on that and we’re to now believe that you’re going to go after big Tech.
What a joke.
Free Speech Alliance Provides Examples of Social Media Bias, Principles of Fairness to AG Barr
In an open letter published Wednesday, the Free Speech Alliance voiced its support of Attorney General William Barr’s concerns regarding the practices of giant social media platforms and recommended four principles of online fairness to combat bias.
The letter to the attorney general, signed by leaders of more than two dozen conservative organizations, including Media Research Center President Brent Bozell, documents examples of anti-conservative bias and censorship by Google, Twitter, and Facebook.
“Each of the major social media platforms has an oversized share of influence on the public conversation,” the letter says. Citing Google as an example, the letter notes that more than 90 percent of all search queries worldwide are done through its technology – giving it “the power to alter the public discourse across the world.”
The letter closes by asking the attorney general to consider four recommended principles of social media platform fairness and “best practices”:
1. Transparency,
2. Clarity of ‘Hate Speech,’
3. Truly diverse hiring practices, and
4. Mirroring the First Amendment
The full letter to Attorney General Barr is presented below.
...
That’s all well and good, but you need to be putting the coup plotters in prison.
If Google bans third party cookies from its Chrome browser like they said they are planning to do, it would spell the end of online web ads from all advertisers except Google Ads.
Using a monopoly in one area (browser dominance) to leverage monopolistic control of another area (online advertising) is about as obvious a violation of anti-trust laws as you can get.
This thread is chockfull of defeatist eeyores who appear to be of childlike reasoning capacity.
Excellent. Gov program DARPA was used by the CIA to create surveillance software and then DARPA funds used to fund business development in Silicon Valley which just happened to develop programs that the CIA found useful. So breaking apart CIA’s technology storefront is key to draining the swamp. WINNING!
Couldn’t happen to a nicer bunch of fellas!
Reddit is hammering a stake through The_Donald, and youtube is banning everyone to the right of The Young Turks. They’re thumbing their noses at you Barr, because they know you are toothless and won’t do anything to stop them before the election.
Cool, let me know when something actually happens.
“I think a lot of people wonder how such huge behemoths that now exist in Silicon Valley have taken shape under the nose of the antitrust enforcers,” Barr said at the time.”
Actually I’m far more curious about why Comey, Clapper, Brennan, and Lynch are still breathing free air.
Maybe it’s just me.
L
Barr’s on the case, no need to worry........ for Big Tech that is!
The Founding States gave Congress the express constitutional power only to grant temporary monopoly power for innovative products, not to break big companies up.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 8: "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries [emphasis added];"
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Corrections, insights welcome.
Earlier this month? It's like Amy Berman Jackson not having a conflict of interest because she cares about the outcome of a case.
A recent article suggest that Joe is the deep-state candidate because they know he will be too ineffectual to interfere in their running the country into the ground.
Excellent. This needs to be an extremely high priority. Alphabet particularly needs to be broken up.
Will Bar’s actions result in millions more being donated to Biden’s election?