Foolish ROI.
For each $5 or so spent, they could have supported the conversion of a rural Chinese person to fervent Christianity.
Instead, this money is going to wealthy doctors that could have written off what was probably inflated medical charges. This could win a few souls. It could also be off-putting to people equally needy that read the story and do not get their bills paid.
Interesting opinion. So in your opinion, they shouldn’t pay off medical debt, but should work to convert Chinese people to Christianity instead?
I guess I’m.missing how one excludes the other, but so be it.