[palmer]

So that means this study looked at an additional 20M patients who are currently infected and haven't died nor recovered,

The study didn't look at any cases. It was a meta-study based on other studies. Without those other studies it is completely speculative and probably junk. Anyone can preprint an article online, it means nothing.

[Svartalfiar]

The study didn't look at any cases. It was a meta-study based on other studies. Without those other studies it is completely speculative and probably junk. Anyone can preprint an article online, it means nothing.

Yes, that's what I mentioned in some of my other posts. But the fact remains that they still somehow have 20M more recoveries in those numbers than John Hopkin's has total cases. So it's not a worthwhile study just based on that.