Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasGator

Yeah, but what about their statement “...reaping far more energy from the reaction than you put in.”

Doesn’t that seam impossible?


58 posted on 02/22/2020 5:30:28 PM PST by CapnJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: CapnJack
E=MC2
60 posted on 02/22/2020 5:38:30 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: CapnJack

One of the places where these schemes all fall apart is that somehow or other you have to confine the fuel at high density as the nuclear processes proceed. That has proven to be impossible, but even if not, the confinement process requires a lot of energy, exceeding that produced by the fusion process itself, as it turns out.


62 posted on 02/22/2020 6:03:04 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: CapnJack
"Doesn’t that seam impossible?"

Why should it?? Any fueled engine "reaps far more energy...than you put in". See your car. You input a tiny amount of energy from your car's battery to get things going, and then "reap" hundreds of miles of travel energy from the fuel. This is no different. It is all about getting (and keeping) things going.

86 posted on 02/23/2020 5:52:08 AM PST by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel and NRA Life Member)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson