Stone files motion demanding judge recuse herself from ruling on new trial request

The Washington Times ^ | Saturday, February 22, 2020 | Jeff Mordock

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

Who could start the legal effort to remove & disbar the judge?

The House of Representatives. They’ll be right on it . . . </sarcasm>

[richardtavor]

Thanks for the clarification. I am a scientist, not a lawyer...

[Hostage]

I am a scientist also but learned about law because lawyers in general suck.

“99% of lawyers give the other 1% a bad name.”

And what’s frightening for us is how social movements are influencing our rigorous scientific communities.

Science is becoming a venue for voting.

[Williams]

No one is going to remove and disbar the judge. There legal system doesn’t operate based on our fantasies. It doesn’t work that way.

[WaltStuart]

No one is going to remove and disbar the judge. There legal system doesn’t operate based on our fantasies. It doesn’t work that way.

—

Likely true.

However, given Trump’s efforts, we can hope justice increases and pours down like a cloudburst on a beleaguered land.

[patriotspride]

Trump also , unlike his predecessors, will point out the two tiered system, and call out these political hacks.

They may win in the courtroom short term, but longer term with a re election hopefully he can rid the system of fools like this one.

[Williams]

Sounds good.

[The Westerner]

This juror Hart was chosen to get free advertising/name recognition when she next runs for office. Police state tactic. I wonder, who are the back room boys running the Democratic Socialist party?