it’s being reported, without any further context, elsewhere; there’s a huge difference between whether what he says means in the race, or in the White house:
21 Feb: Twitchy: NEW: Libertarian Clint Eastwood endorses anti-gun-stop-and-frisk-sugar-cop Mike Bloomberg
by Greg P
https://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/2020/02/21/new-libertarian-clint-eastwood-endorses-anti-gun-stop-and-frisk-sugar-cop-mike-bloomberg/
21 Feb: Newsmax: Wall Street Journal: Eastwood Likes Bloomberg for President
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/bloombergeastwood/2020/02/21/id/955200/
21 Feb: Hollywood Reporter: Clint Eastwood Says Electing Michael Bloomberg Is “the Best Thing We Could Do”
by Katie Kilkenny
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/clint-eastwood-says-electing-michael-bloomberg-is-best-thing-we-could-do-1280579
The problem with all of these articles is that it is based on the same single quote about Bloomberg being “in there” which could mean being in the race to have another option for democrat voters to consider or being in the White House. These liberals writing the articles are clearly spinning it as anti-Trump, which may be the exact opposite intent by Eastwood who otherwise speaks well of Trump.