If you go to the Fox site, there’s a link there to a Juan Williams response, saying that Barr’s DOJ involvement in the Stone case is proof of hypocrisy with regards the tarmac meeting. They are hardly comparable, but to Juan they are.
Juan just says what he’s told to say.
Why is he still there? He was Ailess charity case, his lawn jockey. Shouldn’t Juan be pining at Rogers grave site?
If you go to the Fox site, theres a link there to a Juan Williams response, saying that Barrs DOJ involvement in the Stone case is proof of hypocrisy with regards the tarmac meeting. They are hardly comparable, but to Juan they are.
*****************
So a public tweet by Trump that all can see, criticizing the proceedings against Stone is the same as Clinton having a secret, undocumented meeting for over a half hour with Lynch?
After that meeting, Lynch did not recuse herself, but simply said she was delegating the decision to her subordinate, Comey. As if there was no shame or guilt on her part at all, right?
Juan’s pretzel logic at work again.