Posted on 02/15/2020 1:37:31 PM PST by Libloather
All of the bills sent to the Senate are probably like the New Way Forward Act. Totally ridiculous and probably nonpartisan.
She is 80 years old..MARCH 26...
FIVE MORE WEEKS.
Yup. But, hey, let her keep bringing it up and giving it new life.
November she will be gone and her minions will be back seated
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Maybe healthcare is also on Speaker Pelosi's list, but that’s beside the point.
What Pelosi wrongly ignores for probably most things on her list is that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to dictate policy, regulate, tax and spend for them.
"State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added].” Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”[...] the care of the property, the liberty, and the life of the citizen, under the solemn sanction of an oath imposed by your Federal Constitution, is in the States, and not in the Federal Government [emphases added].” —Rep. John Bingham, Congressional Globe, 1866. (See about middle of 3rd column.)
"It is one of the happy incidents of the federal system that a single courageous State may, if its citizens choose [emphasis added], serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic experiments without risk to the rest of the country.” —Justice Brandeis, Laboratories of democracy.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
So why are the states now letting the feds do their constitutional job to care for the people? (Hint: that’s the wrong question.)
Regarding unconstitutional federal domestic spending and interference with state sovereignty, using inappropriate words like “concept” and “implicit,” the excerpt below from Wickard v. Filburn (Wickard) shows what was left of the defense of 10th Amendment (10A)-protected state sovereignty by the last of state sovereignty-respecting majority justices in United States v. Butler, FDR’s state sovereignty-ignoring activist justices later blatantly ignoring the reasonable Butler interpretation of 10A when they scandalously decided Wickard in Congress’s favor imo.
"10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
"In discussion and decision, the point of reference, instead of being what was "necessary and proper" to the exercise by Congress of its granted power, was often some concept [???] of sovereignty thought to be implicit [??? emphases added] in the status of statehood." —Wickard v. Filburn, 1942.
In other words, most federal domestic policy is based on the politically correct repeal of 10A by FDR’s activist majority justices.
The remedy for the corrupt, unconstitutionally big, post-17th Amendment ratification federal government on our backs…
Patriots need to elect a new Congress that will not only promise to fully support PDJT’s already excellent for MAGA, now KAGA, but will also do the following.
The peoples' new Congress also not only needs to promise to surrender state powers that the feds have been stealing from the states back to the states, but also put a stop to unconstitutional federal taxes, taxes that Congress cannot justify under its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers according to the Gibbons v. Ogden excerpt above.
And to make such changes permanent, patriots need to further support PDJT in leading the states to repeal the 16th and ill-conceived 17th Amendments.
Remember in November!
MAGA! Now KAGA! (Keep America Great Always!)
"The “Holy Grail” of organized crime is to control government power to tax." —me
"The power to tax involves the power to destroy, [...]” —Chief Justice John Marshall, McCulloch v. Maryland, 1819.
"The 16th Amendment effectively repealed the involuntary servitude aspect of the 13th Amendment imo, evidenced by unconstitutional federal taxes." —me
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States." —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"13th Amendment, Section 1:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude [emphasis added], except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."
"16th Amendment:
The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration."
"The ill-conceived 17th Amendment not only effectively politically repealed the 3/4 state supermajority requirement of the Constitution’s Article V for ratification of proposed amendments to the Constitution imo, politically correct interpretations of the Constitution now prevailing under Democratic judicial tyranny, but also consider this. That amendment also effectively nullified Congress’s constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers along with the Supreme Court’s clarification of Congress’s limited power to appropriate taxes." —me
"Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
"The constitutionally undefined political parties are basically rival, corrupt voter unions, “union dues” paid by means of unconstitutional federal taxes. Belonging to a political party means that you are a subject, not a member.” —me
"Patriots need to support PDJT in demanding that Congress moves "April 15" tax day to the day before election day." —me
"The smart crooks long ago figured out that getting themselves elected to federal office to make unconstitutional tax laws to fill their pockets is a much easier way to make a living than robbing banks." —me
"Federal career lawmakers probably laugh all the way to the bank to deposit bribes for putting loopholes for the rich and corporations in tax appropriations laws, Congress actually not having the express constitutional authority to make most appropriations laws where domestic policy is concerned. Such laws are based on stolen state powers and uniquely associated stolen state revenues." —me
Nah, I think she'll be like Senators "KKK" Byrd and "Splash" Kennedy. She'll leave Congress feet first. Amazing how these lie-berals don't know when it's time to move on. These jobs are for life, like being one of the Supremes (minus Diana Ross).
Sorry Vile Botoxian, you can call him an impostor, you can call him impeached forever, and you can claim that “he really didn’t win”!(popular vote nonsense)
He is STILL the President, he’s STILL in the White House, and he’s STILL kicking your smelly Depends @ss every day. Get over it, you stupid old hag.
Sounds like she is trying to put a positive spin on her negative action. I mean, Trump’s poll numbers move up after her actions at the end of SOTU address. Most Americans saw her actions as childish and immature. And many are wondering who would vote for such a person.
She could have peed on it in front of everyone and would defend it. It’s the Democrat code, never admit you did something wrong. It’s the other guy.
She has no choice. Democrats never apologize, never back down.
-PJ
They actually want to bring back every deported illegal retroactive to like 1991!
I actually thought Pelosi was helping Clinton get rid of her emails when she was tearing up all that paper. Either that or she was destroying evidence of her complicity in lying to the FBI.
She had 11 days to think up a different reason for doing what she did. A reason that she thought people would accept this time around as the others didn’t make any sense!! Let’s give her until the end of the month, we’ll hear another one.
Nancy pelosi would get the fbi or atf to murder you today if she knew she could get away with it just like the leftists could in the soviet union using the kgb or in east germany using the stasi.
JoMa
“Eric Swallwell is happy to no longer he the democrat associated with ripping.”
________________________________________________________________________
EXCELLENT!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.