Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fireman15

If you notice the wording....it’s men who produce 3 kids, or reach 50. They didn’t even say that it had to be with one woman.....it could be with 3 women (1 each).

My hunch is that the Supreme Court would be interested in the Constitutional side of this. I doubt if it’d be allowed to stand. Course, it might shock some folks that you might have 3,000 young men per year in the state....volunteer to get the ‘free’ service.


41 posted on 02/14/2020 7:32:16 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: pepsionice

“My hunch is that the Supreme Court would be interested in the Constitutional side of this. I doubt if it’d be allowed to stand. Course, it might shock some folks that you might have 3,000 young men per year in the state....volunteer to get the ‘free’ service.”

I can see it all now. Get a taxpayer vasectomy, get a “Proof of Purchase” card, to get more nookey from nubile women.
The side effect will be a whole new category for fake ID.


69 posted on 02/14/2020 8:38:36 AM PST by Senormechanico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson