Skip to comments.
House acts to remove deadline for Equal Rights Amendment
The Associated Press ^
| February 13, 2020
| By MATTHEW DALY
Posted on 02/13/2020 8:39:06 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: MattMusson
Theres a whole lotta faggotry advocacy on the Left ... like Romans 1:18-32 was happening to them.
21
posted on
02/13/2020 8:53:18 AM PST
by
Rurudyne
(Standup Philosopher)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
RBG said yesterday the deadline should stand.
22
posted on
02/13/2020 8:53:52 AM PST
by
AU72
To: MattMusson
I remember when the ERA was a big deal in the 80's. The proponents swore up and down that it would absolutely positively unequivocally NOT mandate allowing men to share women's restroom or locker facilities. Trust the govt they tell us. They're only here to help, they tell us. They want to make us a more equal society, they tell us.
23
posted on
02/13/2020 8:54:28 AM PST
by
Impala64ssa
(Virtue signalling is no virtue)
To: AU72
RBG said yesterday the deadline should stand.
Yes and the Leftists who were worshipping at her feet are now PUMMELING her for it.
24
posted on
02/13/2020 8:55:35 AM PST
by
Buckeye McFrog
(Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
There is no expiration date on equality,″ said Democratic Rep. Jackie Speier ---------------------------------- True. But there is one on ratifying amendments. :) We'll get to this right after we get that repairations thing worked out. :D
25
posted on
02/13/2020 8:57:13 AM PST
by
cuban leaf
(The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
To: MattMusson
Even more it is about abortion.
26
posted on
02/13/2020 8:57:50 AM PST
by
lastchance
(Credo.)
To: goldstategop
Its also unconstitutional but that doesnt matter to the Democrats.Why don't they just reintroduce the amendment and have all the states vote on it again? That would be constitutional and probably easy to pass now.
The only problem is that they will inject an interpretation of "women" that would include trannies and other weird anomalies.
27
posted on
02/13/2020 8:59:46 AM PST
by
pfflier
To: Oldeconomybuyer
There is no expiration date on equality,″ Or on stupidity.
To: Repealthe17thAmendment
I think this whole thing is a “look over there!” being done by the Dems.
29
posted on
02/13/2020 9:01:32 AM PST
by
cuban leaf
(The political war playing out in every country now: Globalists vs Nationalists)
To: goldstategop
You sure? It’s easy to imagine the cucks in the Senate being afraid to vote against “women”.
30
posted on
02/13/2020 9:01:44 AM PST
by
DesertRhino
(Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
The House approved the resolution, 232-183, on Thursday, sending it to the Senate. ...where it will die.
31
posted on
02/13/2020 9:02:22 AM PST
by
Magnum44
(My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
To: cuban leaf
Democrats themselves baked a deadline into the original ERA when they were sure it would be quickly adopted.
They dont have the votes to pass it again and this is all pure kabuki theater. They know its going nowhere.
As long the GOP controls both the White House and the Senate.
32
posted on
02/13/2020 9:02:26 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: pfflier
They dont have two thirds for it. They need 290 votes in the House and 67 in the Senate.
Good luck with it.
33
posted on
02/13/2020 9:04:17 AM PST
by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: goldstategop
A constitutional amendment cannot be unconstitutional. If they pass the ERA it becomes the constitution.
This push actually started when late Justice Scalia made a comment a decade ago that the Constitution itself does not bar gender discrimination. The feminists went nuts over that and renewed their efforts to pass this.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Sorry but you have to start all over. That states only approved an ERA with a deadline that has expired.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Maybe Ruthie got a look at the WOMEN who she thought were special really look like.
We need ERA like we need STD.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Another bill on the pile of one-sides useless shite the House has been passing, knowing full well it’s no more than propaganda value. I get tweets from my Dem rep every day about all the 400 or so bills the House has sent to the Senate that Evil Mitch is sitting on.
Thank God.
37
posted on
02/13/2020 9:08:35 AM PST
by
bigbob
(Trust Trump. Trust the Plan.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
No doubt it will apply to the men who identify as women and can beat the socks off real women in sports and other physical competitions. These old Democrat hags don’t care about young girls and women who will have to deal with this unfairness.
To: Brookhaven
Most of the new versions proposed actually switches out sex for gender. They like gender better because its a broader term.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Women are a majority in this country and, yet, still beg for an equal rights amendment? Pathetic.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson