Not to be overly critical, but on reading this I felt decieved by the title.
44% is not insignificant, not that it matters since the stated question is so vague.
“Climate Change” is nebulous, I doubt most people would define it in a consistent manner.
What would the response be to more narrowly defined “Climate Change” proposals?
How about a more meaningful and much larger sample?
It’s actually decently warm here in No. Nevada today, I’m glad, I have some important task to do, outside.
If this is the “Climate Change” we are being warned of, BRING IT ON!
Yes, the title “Climate Change” is deceitful. That’s not what they mean.
Actually, the climate has been in a constant state of change since creation, or the “big bang” if you prefer. The change comes from the natural forces of nature, activity of the surface of the sun, and more. Not from human excesses. Nature has built into it a healing quality: forests devastated by fire regenerate, most trash cast into the sea or on the ground will dissolve over the years, a cut on your arm heals itself, and on and on. That is what creation is all about. Creative power regenerates itself. Again, climate is always in a state of change.