Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dave W
Trump's popular vote was not quite that much. The 2016 presidentional election results were as follows:
Trump: 62,985,134 (306 Electoral Collage votes)
Clinton:65,853,652 (232 Electoral Collage votes)

A difference of 2,868,518. This difference is easily attributable to the national reported widespread voter fraud. Large voter fraud in California, New York, Illinois and Massachusetts.


83 posted on 02/11/2020 3:57:06 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: Stand Watch Listen

Trump’s popular vote loss was not quite....”


84 posted on 02/11/2020 3:59:11 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

To: Stand Watch Listen
Yes, you are correct with the popular vote. You can call it fraud all you want, but the history books will record it as an electoral college victory with no asterisk.

When people talk about the 1960 presidential election, I never hear anyone say that it was stolen by the dems because Nixon actually won in Illinois that day. Most people just think it's sour grapes to blame fraudulent voting since no one is ever prosecuted and the media hardly ever covers voter fraud.

The only fraud story that was widely reported, at least from my perspective, was a lady in Iowa who twice voted for Trump. That was front page news in the Washington Post. Unbelievable.

Then there is the situation in Detroit in which the poll workers fed the ballots through the counting machine three times! So, no one really knows the true vote margin in Michigan.

86 posted on 02/11/2020 4:37:16 AM PST by Dave W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson