Just a week ago, he said he needed to hear more witnesses, presumably because there was not yet evidence to convict (otherwise, why would you need to hear more?). He didn’t get the witnesses and still voted to convict. So apparently he based his decision on testimony that was never given.
He’s a loathsome liar.
excellent observation, my FRiend!
Just a week ago, he said he needed to hear more witnesses, presumably because there was not yet evidence to convict (otherwise, why would you need to hear more?). He didnt get the witnesses and still voted to convict. So apparently he based his decision on testimony that was never given.
Hes a loathsome liar.
Excellent point!!!