Judge Andrew Napolitano: Despite his impeachment trial acquittal, Trump clearly guilty of a high crime

Fox News ^ | February 5 2020 | Judge Andrew P. Napolitano

[knighthawk]

The Senate impeachment trial of President Trump ended not with a bang but a whimper. What different outcome could one expect from a trial without so much as a single witness, a single document, any cross-examination or a defendant respectful enough to show up?

Law students are taught early on that a trial is not a grudge match or an ordeal; it is a search for the truth. Trial lawyers know that cross-examination is the most effective truth-testing tool available to them.

But the search for the truth requires witnesses, and when the command from Senate Republican leaders came down that there shall be no witnesses, the truth-telling mission of Trump's trial was radically transformed into a steamroller of political power.

[lepton]

But the search for the truth requires witnesses, and when the command from Senate Republican leaders came down that there shall be no witnesses, the truth-telling mission of Trump’s trial was radically transformed into a steamroller of political power.

---

It was from its inception a ‘steamroller of political power’. Further, if witnesses were needed by some, why would they vote to convict based upon insufficient evidence?

[kanawa]

When money talks, integrity walks.

[JimRed]

So, judge, what was the high crime to which you refer? (crickets)