Posted on 02/04/2020 1:01:42 AM PST by 11th_VA
“It sounds like no one is in charge of the demoncrat party”
Maybe Shiffty Eyes should be called in to straighten this out.
SHADOW??
Whether you want to believe it or not...from a pretty smart guy commenting on Sundance’s thread...:
===>
Clinton and Bloomberg are longtime friends. Steyer is a Podesta friend/Clinton ally. Clinton’s people are on the convention committee (including Podesta).
Bloomberg’s campaign, like Biden’s, is a proxy, just in a different way. He’s already pledged to spend the money, whomever the nominee will be, and I think it’s because he’s never planned to be the one. That Clinton getting in (or winning) seems so, utterly fantastical does not make it less true: the play here is Clinton.
In a planted Op-Ed in The Hill, she’s already been floated as VEEP to add “gravitas” to the ticket, and was quoted as being excited to jump on board with whomever gets the nomination (really? Clinton excited to run as #2? No one buys it … it’s seeding the concept.)
Chaos is also the best, if not the necessary state-of-play for Clinton to parachute in. First as VEEP — a stabilizing force. Then it’s just a re-shuffle to put her at the top of the ticket. VEEP probably then goes to Warren, thinking it placates the “progressive” wing (it won’t).
Bloomberg has no real pitch on the democrat side (neither did Biden) and he has the feel of a pop-up candidate. His “constituency” is pure donor class and astroturf. Hillary has a narrow band of dead-enders and a pitch: I beat Trump once in the popular vote, I can do it again, and I’m eager to settle the score.
What really matters is she still owns the party. That’s how she got her people on the convention committee, which only matters if there’s going to be a need to control it. She’ll take it in broad daylight, with Bernie people (and others) eyes wide open. Clintons and the DNC don’t care. That’s what narrative engineering is for.
I’ve been telling my family this for months. After tonight, I finally won a convert. And she’s PISSED. A long way to go yet, but this might turn out to be that moment that once you see, you can’t unsee.
To be successful doing that you have to be willing
to successfully "disappear" people.
"Oh Hillary, DNC calling on line one!"
You win the thread!
I looked at that and said the same thing! What does that even mean?
Who let this 'journalist' actually write this driveling material?
Any opponent worth their salt will use this material to point out the utter incompetence of the Democrat party as a broken and flawed institution... Regardless of whether they are winning, losing or being anointed. And if this sort of foolishness keeps up... Trump will be anointed.
What if Trump won the DEMOCRATS IOWA CAUCUS?
Where I went, every hand went up for Trump. No votes on Walsh or Weld.
Should be either sows distrust or erodes trust. just sayin
Even worse. These are the people that want to run our voting system!
The Iowa Caucus didn’t kill itself.
Any Caucus is a socialist travesty. Everyone should know who they want. One man(woman) one vote. what drugs were they on when they came up with Caucuses.
As opposed to the governing institutions which will proclaim them lullabies and keep on keepin on with their kleptocracy.
Joe as veep made sense. Assassin insurance.
Piaps as veep is a death wish, making the suicide option actually believable.
More accurate.
Just saw a clip Sec of Homeland security. They offered to check their voting program. They declined.
What does it mean to “erode distrust”?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.