Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VanShuyten

That’s what I’m thinking. If it’s that easy to get fusion power, who gives a crap about the rest of the device?


47 posted on 01/31/2020 2:19:03 PM PST by Excuse_My_Bellicosity (Liberalism is a social disease.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity

“That’s what I’m thinking. If it’s that easy to get fusion power, who gives a crap about the rest of the device?”

They are NOT getting fusion energy. Fusion is a source of neutrons.


52 posted on 01/31/2020 2:39:46 PM PST by TexasGator (Z1z)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

To: Excuse_My_Bellicosity; VanShuyten
Um.... If they can get controlled deuterium fusion working, why do they need a thorium fission reaction?

D-D fusion is a tabletop curiosity (eg ICF reactor)which requires more energy input than output, but it produces neutrons. Not self sustaining tho. But if scaled a bit the neutrons can be captured by thorium eventually resulting in fissionable U-233. The resulting fission will exceed breakeven by quite a bit, and the fission produces extra neutrons which permit scaling to higher efficiency. Also I notice the lifecycle to U-233 produces some high energy electrons (beta) which could conceivably be utilized to improve the fusion.

53 posted on 01/31/2020 6:08:52 PM PST by no-s (when democracy is displaced by tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson