Posted on 01/30/2020 3:54:15 PM PST by kevcol
Lawyers for columnist E. Jean Carroll, who accused President Trump of raping her in a Manhattan department store in the 1990s, are seeking to collect DNA evidence from the president.
.
.
.
“After Trump sexually assaulted me, I took the black dress I had been wearing and hung it in my closet,” Carroll said in a statement to The Hill on Thursday. “I only wore it once since then and that was at the photoshoot for the New York Magazine article about my book.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
As if
“And she saved the dress why?”
Linda Tripp told her to.
She saw Monica Lewinsky do that. It was probably on the History chanell on TV the night she made up her hallucinatory fantasy about "What if I were ravished by the President? How would it feel? What would I wear? Monica gets all the attention. It should be mine. Mine."
The people in the mental health facility were probably sick and tired of hearing the fantasy story. Now we have to hear it.
she wears the dress again? I can see her preserving it in a box or soem thing as evidence but not wearing it again.
Kwazzah skank
How many times a week has she had to subject herself to seeing this dress over 25 odd years?
How long is the statute of limitations here?
So they met in 1987 and that substantiates an encounter from EITHER 1995 or 1996?
So much specificity from her expect on key details.
She was once fairly hot.
It’s ludicrous.
I agree with post 16, it’s PR advertising for her book.
Lawyers will do anything, such as write a frivolous demand letter, for money — and/or political purposes.
Check the dress for Les Moonves’ crusty DNA.
Now she requires eyebleach.
Good luck with that.
If she’s a writer, she should learn how to spin a more interesting variation on this tale:
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Margie_Schoedinger
Schoedinger filed a lawsuit on 2 December 2002, asking for $50 million for “emotional distress, loss of freedom and ability to pursue Plaintiff’s own dreams, alienation of affection from Plaintiff’s spouse, loss of privacy, being disparaged on the Internet, and loss of Plaintiff’s ability to be a Christian writer.”[1] She claims that Bush brutally raped and kidnapped her and her husband and drugged them both, in December of 2002 in Sugarland, Texas and that he threatened to kill her. [2]
The first known US newspaper to report on the court filing did so on 11 December 2002; LeaAnn Klentzman for the the Fort Bend Star covered the story, alleging that Bush conspired with the FBI and local police to cover up his alleged crime. The editor, Jean Sandlin later stated that the “report wasn’t supposed to go up yet”. Speaking of Schoedinger, he added: “I had heard she was a nutcase.”[3] The web page was captured 49 times by the Internet Archive, the earliest cature being 31 December 2002, but all known captures are 404 - file not found.[4]
Scoop republished the Fort Bend Star story on 13 December 2002[5], and it was reportedly widely circulated on the internet at the time,[6] although little evidence remains visible as of 2019.
On December 20, 2002, Sean Carter for CounterPunch wrote an article on The Bush Rape Story which was still online as of 2019. Carter wrote that “anyone with a computer and a modem can verify the story by downloading court documents. However, the accuracy of the story does not seem to be enough for the media. Apparently, this story does not meet its threshold of “responsible journalism.””[6]
I would think the statute has passed, but in the era of Weinstein and Cosby states have been lengthening them and in some cases eliminating them. This seems to be a textbook case for statutes of limitation. How do you litigate a case where the witnesses and evidence are 30 years old if they are even still around?
Perhaps she’s trying to establish enough of a defense against a libel lawsuit for her fraudulent book.
There was no chain of custody on the evidence.
I don’t see how it can be admissible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.