We are too busy ‘picking nits’ with what the Dems troweled out. We are lost in the weeds line by line negating a mountain of accusations rather than zeroing in on the coup, which would explain the Dems actions.
We are too busy ‘picking nits’ with what the Dems troweled out. We are lost in the weeds line by line negating a mountain of accusations rather than zeroing in on the coup, which would explain the Dems actions.
—
I think they’ll get to that, but the main criticism of the dems is they have no facts.
The president is listing the facts.
The facts of process.
The facts of the case.
Sometimes facts are mundane. Sometimes facts don’t make for good drama.
But all the facts are important.
The facts of process.
The facts of the case.
“We are lost in the weeds line by line negating a mountain of accusations rather than zeroing in on the coup, which would explain the Dems actions.”
I don’t think the details take away from the big picture - they need to go into detail to prove the coup.
For example, in order to prove a fake Rembrandt is a forgery, there has to be all kinds of forensic science, chemical analysis, microscopic analysis of brush strokes, layers, and discussion of the history of painting techniques.
Only after it is proven to be a forgery can the case focus on criminal motives for making the forgery and who forged it.
What the defense is doing right now is destroying the House’s arguments by one, until it’s obvious that their entire case is lies and fabrication. Once they do that, it be obvious what they are really saying: that this has been a frame up (a coup attempt).
Pam Bondi is starting to get into the Bidens right now... popcorn