Posted on 01/26/2020 11:26:27 AM PST by central_va
WASHINGTON President Donald Trumps campaign is considering only participating in general election debates if an outside firm serves as the host, and his advisers recently sat down with the nonprofit Commission on Presidential Debates to complain about the debates it hosted in 2016.
The Dec. 19 meeting between Frank Fahrenkopf, a prominent Republican and co-chairman of the commission; Brad Parscale, campaign manager for Trumps reelection effort; and another political adviser, Michael Glassner, came soon after Trump posted on Twitter that the 2016 debates had been biased.
(Excerpt) Read more at yahoo.com ...
“There should be at least one debate hosted by Rush Limbaugh, Mark Steyn and Mark Levin. “
They could make that a pay-per-view.
Lou Dobbs, indeed, would be outstanding, but he’s such a vocal Trumper that he’d likely never be approved.
I do differentiate between FNC and Fox Business.
I have my TV constantly tuned to FBN but FNC has become practically a subsidiary of the DNC.
While I still do my best to keep up-to-date with Hannity, Ingraham and Fox & Friends, it’s unbearable to watch much else.
“I think he should ignore any questions directed at him, and just give his own talking points.”
Isn’t that pretty much what all politicians do anyway?
Don’t know if Thomas Sowell is still up to it...
Why in the world would we even need any Republican Debates ? We only have ONE CANDIDATE.
Finally, some adults making obvious decisions. Now let’s fire Vindman and the rest of the deep state traitors.
Perhaps for the entertainment value. Trump debating Hillary was hilarious. Imagine Trump debating senile ole Joe?
The story is about debates for the general, not the primaries.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.