[Jess Kitting]

They should, at the very least, subpoena the so-called whistleblower.

Trump has a right to face his accuser, and his defense team should have an opportunity to cross-examined him.

[Jess Kitting]

cross-examine him/her (the whistleblower).

[hanamizu]

They should, at the very least, subpoena the so-called whistleblower.
Trump has a right to face his accuser, and his defense team should have an opportunity to cross-examined him.

---

A local man contributes the following dem talking point to the local paper: “Suppose an upstanding citizen sees a known criminal enter a bank with a gun and then calls the police. The police catch the career criminal putting the money he robbed back, and claims that he was in fact not robbing the bank but trying to prove the bank manager was crooked. Does the bank robber, caught in the act by the police have the right to cross examine the upstanding citizen who called the cops? Of course not!’

In his scenario, the known criminal in PDJT, the whistle blower is just a fine citizen reporting a crime. The police are the House Democrats. Only problem is the “bank robbery” is just a phone call, which rarely a crime. Nevertheless, this has been printed at least twice in the local paper, which is quite conservative.