Graham said he will vote against calling Hunter and Joe as witnesses. He claims they deserve investigation, but it should be done in a different venue. But Graham has done batsh*t as chairman of the Judiciary Committee. He has held no hearings on the Russia and Ukrainian hoaxes. None on FISA abuse and the IG report.
Ms Lindsey is in complete CYA mode. He’s rattled, nervous and not making any sense at all when he is in front of the camera. Someone is really turning up the heat on him.
Hopefully, Maria will hold his feet to the fire re: his saying one thing; don't do anything about it.
He needs to commit to some action real soon or he's going to be called a liar. Not by us, but by the voters of South Carolina.
Charley and Pugmama, spread the word in the Palmetto State!
To all other South Carolinians on this thread, now’s the time to flood the newspapers with letters to the editor on Graham. Ultimately, he’ll listen to his own Republican voters, no?
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) We're watching you Linda!
But Graham has done batsh*t as chairman of the Judiciary Committee. He has held no hearings on the Russia and Ukrainian hoaxes. None on FISA abuse and the IG report.
From his point of view: Why should he? Look how much support he gets while aiding and abetting the coup. Now he looks at Rip Van Sessions poll numbers and knows he has nothing to fear from the GOP base. Graham fully intends to continue the “vote for me because I am not a Democrat” lowest common denominator beltway jive. Until GOP voters hold Republicans like Graham accountable nothing will change.
I believe Graham is in it up to his eyeballs in corrupt money from Ukraine, Iran and possibly more. It makes sense, to keep his ass out of court, he’d cover, cover, cover, for the other corrupt politicians (both sides of the asile).
Horowitz appeared before Senate Judiciary on December 11. The subject was “Examining the Inspector General’s Report on Alleged Abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.”
Nothing came of it. Just pointing out that Graham did arrange a hearing. I believe he had it “in a hurry” on purpose, so that there was insufficient time to diget the contents of the report and form questions that were more than superficial.
I agree with your conclusion, Graham is an ineffective chairman. So take the “did have a hearing” fact as a nitpick.