Or Planned Parenthood because some people think abortion on demand is wrong? Also remember what was legal in the 19th century. OK, maybe what CNN does is technically legal most of the time? We can agree on that. CNN is not MS-13. I will also agree that we could not have a viable legal framework based on 300 million individual opinions of right and wrong. While I admit that Crowdstrike has not been proven to have committed crimes, I believe it has played a key role in a despicable act, and maybe the people who work there are not aware of it.
I am really looking forward to the defense. At the least we will hear real evidence. I don’t believe they will waste our time, nor the sitting Senators’ time with redundancy and innuendo.
While I generally agree with what you said, I'd say the difference with Planned Parenthood is that they take federal funding of taxpayer money, while the others are for-profit companies that live or die by consumer demand, profitability, and brand reputation.
If taxpayers paid for guns, or cigarettes, or political opposition research, I'd say they'd have a good basis to complain.
-PJ