Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Freee-dame
And that was after Obama suckered Ukraine into disarming themselves on the premise that we would defend them against any sort of Russian aggression, right?

My mind plays tricks on me but that seems to be the way I remember it.

202 posted on 01/23/2020 12:29:50 PM PST by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]


To: Texas Eagle; Freee-dame; All

The article below explains the surrender of nuclear weapons by Ukraine in detail. In 1991 Ukraine had the third largest number of nuclear weapons. By 1996 they had returned all the nukes to Russia in exchange for assurances of economic and military aid. Hah!! In 1991 Bush 1 was president and left office in 1993 when Clinton entered the presidency. It looks like the disarming process started under Bush 1 and was completed under Clinton. Therefore, Obama had absolutely nothing to do with this. Yes, our minds do play tricks on us. At 81 my memory is not what it once was. Thanks we now have Google memory.

https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/Ukraine-Nuclear-Weapons


238 posted on 01/23/2020 1:10:56 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson