Posted on 01/21/2020 11:44:30 AM PST by Mount Athos
Hospitals across the United States are said to have granted Microsoft, Amazon and IBM access to sensitive identifiable medical records.
The tech giants are each working with medical centers in Washington, Massachusetts and Minnesota.
Google will now have access to patients' test results, diagnoses and hospitalizations to give them a full digital health history. Neither doctors nor the patients in the 21 states where it will be used had been told about it.
About 150 Google employees and 100 Ascension staff collaborated on Project Nightingale, transferring the personal data of more than 50 million Americans to Google.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...
Sorry...twichery fingies
A family member spent several weeks in the hospital. Family phones and email were inundated with medical spam and phishing on day two in the hospital and have been continuous for months.
Our most sensitive data now stored (at the very least), in those non-medical businesses servers (cloud is servers).
Data that can/will negatively affect our liberties and choices in yet-uimagined ways. Joined with genetic/DNA data, buying/drinking/smoking data, driving data, gun/ammo data (you use credit cards?)...are YOU a risky bet, in any way?
Guess what else has been in their sites for many years (besides gun-grabbing)...hint...our 401ks...
Even that would be OK if they were doing it under contract for the medical provider and signed the agreements you mentioned.
These large healthcare companies use consultants and contractors all the time, many of them having some access to patient data.
We saw that coming a mile down the road.
Yup
Ten years ago, we had to get a new doctor and she was all hyper over LE hubby having a gun in the house. We complained and found a new doctor immediately. She soon left the plan.
A very timely article. Today, I received a very expensive multi page in full color ad, addressing a very specific heart condition and a special piece of equipment for that defect. The mailing was addressed to me by name.
I showed it to my wife, a retired RN, and she said that that had to come from 2 sources. Our current big time HMO or the hospital that had done echo cardiograms before we went to the big HMO.
So when I read this article, one of the hospital pictures showed a photo of a sister hospital that did my echo cardiogram years ago.
Bingo!
Has there been a change to HIPAA to allow this?
p
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.