Posted on 01/20/2020 11:38:03 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
Who cares? They’re dirty and the Swamp knows it.
The astonishing effrontery to this breathtaking!
Bull$hit from the senile pervert.
Debunked is the New Democrat buzzword to intimidate people into not asking questions about Democrat corruption.
“conclusively debunked”
By Whom? When?
Or,is this another example of repeat a lie often enough and it becomes accepted as truth?
Honest coverage? You mean like broadcasting this?
FLASHBACK, 2018: Joe Biden Brags At CFR Meeting About Withholding Aid To Ukraine To Force Firing Of Prosecutor
Not only is there “no evidence” for Republicans’ main argument against the Vice President — there is a mountain of evidence that actively debunks it
WHERE IS THIS EVIDENCE??? does it Trump a Videotaped CONFESSION???
These idiots recite their Shiffty parody points and ignore the actual transcript of Trump’s perfect call.
Commie Biden hopes if he says its DEBUNKED enough that people will believe it..its a typical commie trick
A true theory should have some basis of fact of which there is NONE here.
It should be called, "The Lying Leftist Trump Ukraine Conspiracy Delusion."
It sounds like shifty schiff is writing for gropin joe.
The communist prog media will proclaim it all so intelligent, cerebral, learned, scholarly and enlightened.
The other cows will be mooing back.
.
The hired liaress who leads lying ****s for Biden speaks. Here's her employer:
WATCH: Joe Biden Brags About Rigging The Ukranian Political System
>>Debunked is the New Democrat buzzword to intimidate people into not asking questions about Democrat corruption.<<
Oh the biden corruption is quite bunked.
“ Biden, among other international officials, was pressing for a more aggressive investigation of corruption in Ukraine, not a softer one.”
Which, of course explains why they wanted to impeach Trump for pressing for a more aggressive investigation. Oh, wait.
Really? When and where? Can I get a link?
It wouldn’t be so sad he is trying to cover himself if the act he pulled wasn’t on film and no where in the conversation Trump had did it mention that Biden was a presidential candidate and it was not he that heard it but others around him. Impeach them.
So I guess his phone statement can be twisted into something with direct first person proof clearing the charges but it is grounds for an impeachment inquiry based upon second hand information from non-creditable witnesses as they did not hear anything directly and are therefore hearsay?
But for them to use hearsay, a statement that is not offered for the truth of the statement, but rather to show the state of mind, emotion or physical condition can be an exception to the rule against hearsay evidence. For instance, testimony that there was a heated argument can be offered to show anger and not for what was said.
However, that is not what this was about so the statements being levied cannot be anything but hearsay.
rwood
Virtually every major media organization is staffed by Democrats. And by the way they're turning on Bernie now, I guess they've received their marching orders. What's more, is she saying that if the newspapers have "investigated" there is no need for a formal investigation by officials with the legal right and training and wherewithal to carry it out? Wow, I guess we don't need the FBI anymore! We have the NYT to investigate crimes!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
