Another red flag is his static approach to the debt. There’s a clear indication that higher taxes would reduce the debt whereas no extra revenue would be generated by economic growth.
States were watching what happened in 2008.
Go to the US Congress with a sufficiently butt-puckering Chicken Little tale of impending doom and terror and you WILL receive a bailout.
No matter how many people don’t want them to.
We’ll just crank the printing presses up from 11 to 12 and go on as usual. The rest of the world will shrug and go along. They’ll have little choice.
Yes, that’s what it seems like here. Rather odd for a libertarian author to be using a static interpretation. You would think that he would be all-in for dynamic forecasting.