Ah, no—using the nonprofit code to redirect the bulk of funds to yourself in salary, while insignificantly contributing to your chosen “cause” is not okay.
Did I miss something here? Where in this article does it say anything about the ‘bulk of funds’ going to his salary?
‘Rothschild admitted afterwards that he thought his money had been adequately spent.’
Apparently, the main donor was happy.
I also noticed that missing from the article was how much the salary actually was. Makes me suspicious. If it was a small percentage then that is a different story than if it was a significant percentage. Does it say anywhere how much the salary was?