Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks; All
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act [??? emphasis added] requires those working in the private sector or for state or local governments to show that age caused the discriminatory action."
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument

Every judge in the country should always first check if an action or law of the unconstitutionally big (hint) federal government is reasonably justifiable under one of Congress’s constitutionally enumerated powers, Congress’s Article I, Section 8-limited powers a good place to start.

”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.

In this case, the only age-related right affecting all citizens that the states have amended the Constitution to expressly protect deals only with voting rights issues, evidenced by the 19th Amendment.

"19th Amendment:

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.

Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added]."

But since the referenced case clearly does not deal with voting rights issues, Congress has no express power to deal with the kind of age discrimination presented by this case. So we’re back to prohibited federal government powers clarified in the Butler excerpt above imo.

In other words, President Lyndon B. Johnson probably should never have signed the constitutionally indefensible, Democratic vote-winning Age Discrimination in Employment Act into law imo.

So with all due respect to Justice Roberts, if he wants to find something unconstitutional, then he should consider that school children who are up to speed with the significance of constitutionally enumerated rights might point out that frivolous court cases in the queue are probably compromising the 6th Amendment-protected right to a speedy trial for other cases in the queue.

Corrections, insights welcome.

Remember in November!

MAGA! Now KAGA! (Keep America Great Always!)

32 posted on 01/16/2020 4:45:34 PM PST by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Amendment10

Actually, it’s the 26th Amendment that deals with age.


38 posted on 01/16/2020 6:34:38 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (Show me the people who own the land, the guns and the money, and I'll show you the people in charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson