What is the point of this opening question which by the end of the article still stands alone? Do they have a "history together," or not? If you don't know, are you just insinuating something to see if it'll stick?
I don't watch Ingraham anymore. Something about her I don't like, maybe the delivery, maybe the voice. But she does interrupt a lot, it doesn't necessarily mean anything.
He's using Laura as "clickbait". The article has virtually nothing to do with her, other that to draw eyeballs. Unfortunately, it discredits "Sundance's" credibility, as if he had any to spare.