Posted on 01/13/2020 11:53:10 AM PST by rktman
Harry and Meghan may settle in the US eventually — but not while President Donald Trump is in charge.
Friends have told the Daily Mail that while the couple plan to live in Canada at first — although probably not on Vancouver Island — their ultimate aim is to have a home and business in Los Angeles. Meghan grew up in the city and her mother, Doria Ragland, still lives there. Miss Ragland, 63, was seen walking her two dogs near her home last week after the royal couple's bombshell news.
However, staunch Democrat Meghan, who has openly been critical of Mr Trump and missed the President's state visit to the UK last year, has said that she will not move to the US while he is in charge.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Like all of us, PRESIDENT TRUMP will one day die.
At that point can we have him stuffed and put in the chair behind the RESOLUTE DESK?
That way we would never be burdened with fake royals and we could hear SanFran Nan screaming from HELL.
What in the world does she have against President Trump??? He’s improving USA a LOT. And he’s winning on everything!
Well she can freeze her a$$ of in Canada for 5 more years .... suck it up Canada, a little Royal welfare won’t break the bank.
You are correct. But occasionally special circumstances occur. Keeping Ms. Markle and her brand of pseudo Kardashian promotion offshore might be worth the downside of a bit of a dynasty.
Good. Never come back.
I despise her because she is a Gold Digging user.
Don’t like the so-called Royals much either.
The sociopath and the pathetic cuck.
That would be news to King William IV. He clashed repeatedly either his Sister-in-Law the Duchess of Kent over how the future Queen Victoria was being raised. He publicly criticized her but never prevented the Duchess from raising her daughter. (Preventing the Duchess from becoming Regent was another matter entirely.)
I think you are looking at theory rather than reality. The Queen might have a reserve power lurking somewhere but there is no way on God’s green Earth that she would or could take custody of her great grandson from his parents, even if the boy wasn’t in Canada.
They’re special don’t ya know.
“while he is in charge.”
It seems Meghan has a problem with anyone other than herself being in charge. Can’t get along with her own family, She goes to the UK thinking she is going to be in charge of the Royals,. Now she wants to be in charge of the POTUS. It also sounds like she was in charge of her first marriage with ridiculous and strange pre-nuptial requests, it lasted two years.
MAGA 2020 & Beyond
https://www.amazon.com/MAGA-2020-Beyond-Milo-Yiannopoulos/dp/1925645487/
That becomes a reason to vote for Trump - so we don’t have her perpetual liberal soap opera here.
MAGA 2020 & Beyond
https://www.amazon.com/MAGA-2020-Beyond-Milo-Yiannopoulos/dp/1925645487/
Genesis 4
15 And the Lord said unto him, Therefore whosoever slayeth Cain, vengeance shall be taken on him sevenfold. And the Lord set a mark upon Cain, lest any finding him should kill him.
Oh Darn!
Trump is worse than queen grandma. No one wants you here
Piers Morgan tweeted: “People say I’m too critical of Meghan Markle – but she ditched her family, ditched her dad, ditched most of her old friends, split Harry from William & has now split him from the Royal Family. I rest my case.”
I’m sure her new best friends, Hillary - the Obamas and the Clooneys are really impressed with her refusing to live in the USA.
Poor Harry - he’s a prop.
King William IV and the actress Mrs. Jordan? 5 boys/5 girls, she got just the girls back until she broke the agreement to stay off the stage. And back to court they were brought, to rejoin their brothers.
I'm not sure that the Preogative would apply to Victoria in the 4th's case, tho, because Victoria, his eventual successor, was his brother's issue, but not his direct line.
I see where he would be upset with the Duchess tho. In his 60’s with no legitimate children, no luck on producing heirs with his new young wife Adelaide, his brothers dead, so that by 1830 there was a succession crisis, and Victoria, at one time 6th or so in line became both heir and spare presumptive, to be called to court to assume some duties (sliding back to spare if Adelaide had surviving children). I can also see where the Duchess of Kent, a little wackadoodle herself with laundry of her own, wouldn't want her daughter exposed to the 10 illegitimate Fitzclarence children, coveting her dead husband's crown over any issue from Adelaine. Kent refused to attend the 4th's coronation and was willing to publish a laundry list of the King's doings, disasterous at a time rival dukes were jostling for claim. So the king declared he would not die until Victoria was 18. Quite a backstory!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.