Posted on 01/04/2020 4:53:24 AM PST by Kaslin
That depends on who might have invited him....
They are distressed over American victories they see as Republican victories. If Obama had okayed the operation from a golf course, the Left would be orgasming over it for the next ninety days and you would be seeing political slogans like ‘X alive and Y dead’.
The are not “conflicted”.
They hate the United States.
They hate the existence of a free United States.
Period.
No conflict.
Trump is more popular than ever! He piles success on top of success! The economy is booming! Prosperity is unprecedented! His rallies attract thousands of people! TRUMP wins! Wins! WINS! America is great again!
Nothing could devastate the Democrats more!
The last thing they want is success for America--especially under the leadership of President Donald Trump!
option in every circumstance is between unilateral surrender or total war.
This binary fallacy is indemic in our college educated Americans.
It exists not just in foreign policy, but in domestic also.
It exists not just in politics, but in business and HITECH also (Intentional use of the the term HITECH, which is the name of a law that gave many billions to Corporatist welfare with a binary view of techology.)
Electricians have a single-pull double-throw switch and a double-pull double-throw switch. There are many computer and high tech applications where those concepts could be applied. But many of our best and brightest can only conceive of on and off, only a single-pull single-throw operation in hi tech.
No.
He was an enemy soldier, a commander of an irregular army at war with the United States.
The two are not mutually exclusive.
Terror can, and often has been, state policy and/or military policy.
He was an enemy soldier, a commander of an irregular army at war with the United States.
—
So we shot back.
In a war.
Right?
You have a problem with that?
We’re only allowed to get shot at?
Never shoot back.
(And BTW, the guy is ALSO a terrorist. But I realize you don’t want to entertain that idea.)
“I’d say an uncharitable explanation is far more likely: they’re on Iran’s payroll.”
Agree.
I have a problem with not being prepared for the war that follows.
And yes, it may not come.
But the constant attention to naming the enemy TACTIC of "terrorism" while not naming the ENEMY himself (Saudi Arabia-Pakistan-Iran) sets us up for defeat.
And believing you cannot be defeated is the first step down the road to disaster.
No I have no problem with killing this guy. Not at all.
—
It’s hard to tell from your posts.
You seem to be doing a lot of whining about it.
Anyway, glad to hear you say it.
Because this guy was really worth killing.
If it makes you feel any better (and I know it won’t but I will put it out there anyway) Trump is way ahead of you in not wanting a major war right now. If for no other reason that it will hurt him in the coming election. You don’t start wars in January of an election year.
But that’s not his only reason.
Trump IS the president of Peace and Prosperity. Trump BELIEVES in Peace and Prosperity.
Trump is able to continue to deliver Peace and Prosperity.
Ha....Quote of the year
And he will keep it up
Chicoms, Norks gone quiet
Dims discombobulated
Massive WINING again.
Donald the Strong.
Obama paid them jizia in the form of $billions in cash. Trump said “Nope” and killed them. Obama is a worm. Trump is a man.
LOL....good one.
From VOAT: “If I didn’t know any better, I’d say Trump is tracking Pelosi’s contacts in the middle east for targeting.”
.
Siding with Terrorists - Democrats weaving their own Nooses ...
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.