Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ChicagoConservative27
Specifically, Slotkin cited the potential for retaliation from Iran against US troops, diplomats, and allied forces in the region as a major reason, writing that "it is critical that the Administration has thought out the moves and counter-moves this attack will precipitate."

They have been retailiating for decades, while we "monitor" the situation...sheesh.

McChrystal said that while "there was good reason" to attack Soleimani over the deaths of US forces by Iranian-placed roadside bombs in Iraq, "to avoid a firefight, and the contentious politics that would follow, I decided that we should monitor the caravan, not strike immediately."

9 posted on 01/03/2020 12:43:16 PM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 1Old Pro

Yep - they think being frozen with indecision is a good thing...Trump told everyone his promise was a threat and acted forthwith - they hate that in a President....Best President Ever!
MAGA!!!


64 posted on 01/04/2020 3:15:53 AM PST by trebb (Don't howl about illegal leeches, or Trump in general, while not donating to FR - it's hypocritical.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson