Hate flag.
The Gay Mafia wanted to use this one but it was already taken.
Posted on 12/29/2019 6:42:18 AM PST by Kaslin
A truce has been called between religious folks and gays. Or at least that's what we're being told. The Fairness for All Act, legislation intended to give rights to both Christian conservatives and transgenders, has been put before the House. For the latter, it proposes that "sexual orientation" be added to the Civil Rights Act, making it hard to discriminate against anyone on the basis of sexual identity. It gives sweeping protections in housing, business, banking, and "public accommodations." On the other hand, it grants protections to anyone in a business with fewer than 15 employees and grants exemptions to anyone in a "faith-based" organization. The Deseret News says it resulted from a dialogue between LGBT groups and representatives from the Seventh-Day Adventists, the Mormons, the Council for Christian Colleges and Universities, and other such suit-and-tie respectables.
But those of us who've escaped the wasteland-in-training known as Seattle know that the LGBT community is just that — a community. Not a uniform band of orthodox goose-steppers, but a volatile cocktail of competing doctrinaires — a hodgepodge of neatniks and weirdos, kind people and jackasses, bullies and victims. The whole gamut of men, both rotten and trustworthy. I've spent time with lots of these people, both as a coke-head and a straight-laced Christian, and I can attest that the majority are decent people. Many of them sexually looser than us, to be sure, but otherwise decent.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Hate flag.
The Gay Mafia wanted to use this one but it was already taken.
The road to hell is paved with ‘religious exemption.’
Don’t ever let anyone purport to give you something that’s already yours.
The religious exemption will be shot down by a liberal judge and the rest will stay. They don’t compromise.
Lost me right there.
I supposed the “otherwise” could make Hitler “decent.”
Then you had better be numbered among the few of us who advocate for the re-criminalization of homosexual sodomy on the state level. Lawrence v. Texas got this terroristic ball rolling.
People who defend natural sex be cause it alone is aligned with God's Design and Natural Law (i.e. in contrast to contracepted sex), are still repudiated as some kind of weirdo at best, a sexual retrograde at worst.
As I look around and observe things, I notice that all-- 100% --- of LBGT straight "allies" are contraceptors, because what they all have in common is that they don't accept normal sex as a moral norm.
...Good point. Even on the FR Religion Forum, there’s a lot of toleration of adultery and non-natural sex
I see the Word of God being bluntly clear about acts that prevent one from entering into the Kingdom, and yet Adultery is barely blinked at these days, but is exactly treated the same in the New Testament. Yes sodomy is evil, but so are a lot of other acts. Seek First The Kingdom of God is our instructions.
Go google the interview of “moderate” Biden who says that the “Equality Act” must be passed, then Christians can be classified as “terrorists” by the federal government and can be monitored by the Justice Department and Homeland Security. And he claims they were already doing that in the Obama administration.
Biden calling for classifying Christians as terrorists and putting them under federal surveillance:
https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1182460792605728768
Certain to be backed by the ABA, trial lawyers, so they can ram it home to the businesses and tax payers.
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
Patriots are reminded that the states have never expressly constitutionally given the feds the specific power to address sex-related rights outside the scope of voting rights, evidenced by the 19th Amendment.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation [emphasis added]."
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
So this politically correct legislation by a RINO is as unconstitutional as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and its associated titles are imo, these bogus federal laws unconstitutional attempts by post-17th Amendment ratification career Democrats and RINOs to exploit low-information voters to stay in power imo.
Consider that existing constitutionally enumerated voting rights protections are as fair as the law can get imo.
Remember in November!
MAGA! Now KAGA! (Keep America Great Always!)
"Dialogue" in Newspeak means 'I give up, do what you will.'"
What's the opposite of The Midas Touch? Cause, that what kommiefornians have.
NEVER! NEVER! GIVE IN!
I sure hope they are not demonrats
On this forum, we should refer to “them” as homosexual!
The use of the term “gay” to refer to homosexual was the first effort I can recall homosexuals using to “soften” the language and remove the stigma associated with homosexual behavior.
In November 1987 an article entitled “The Overhauling of Straight America” appeared in Guide Magazine. A few years later its authors expanded it into a book: Marshall Kirk, Hunter Madsen: “After the Ball — How America will conquer its fear and hatred of Gays in the 1990s”. (Plume, 1990), ISBN: 0452264987.
http://library.gayhomeland.org/0018/EN/EN_Overhauling_Straight.htm
I AGREE!
Interesting. What really gets me is the term homophobia. It infers that anyone opposed to homosexuals or their agenda is motivated out of fear.
Stop letting people who hate you use your “fair play” values against you. They will break their rules and promises once in power.
Giving in and bending over are essentially the same thing.
Bob Hope once joked about leaving California before homosexuality will be mandatory ... these days I openly observe that via the already in place doctrine of abrogation it will be an easy thing for the new Caliph (the Antichrist) to give a new homosexual friendly / mandatory Islam ... for while it may be out of fashion to think AC will be a poofter I see no way many in the West will file into Mosques to take whatever mark they demand unless they can take their poofters and gender crazy with them.
They were. Until O’Bummer. Then they switched. But they’re still liberals.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.