[JohnEBoy]

I believe the shock of the 2016 election will be exceeded by the shock of results of the 2020 election. However, it will not be a surprise as 2016 was. Rather the shock will be the level of landslide. The polls are beginning to show it as well as the enthusiasm at Trump’s rallies.

It’s one thing to rig a poll in one candidate’s favor when they are relatively even. It’s much more difficult when one candidate (Trump) is head and shoulders ahead. As summer goes on, more and more minorities will join the Trump Train. And many diehard democrats will be disillusioned and stay home on election day.

[MrEdd]

I believe that the number of Democrats who just stay home will be fewer than those who go out and vote for the socialist candidate.

And I am fairly certain that there will be one.

[kearnyirish2]

A lot of Democrats (primarily white ones, but some minorities) voted for Trump in 2016, and the Dem establishment has spent 3 years trying to prevent a recurrence of that (apparently unsuccessfully). 2016 was about large-scale disillusionment in both parties (first with Trump’s victory in the primary process, then in the general election); I believe it will still play a key role in 2020 (helping Trump).

Too many people from both parties believe he represents their interests better than the dopes leading the two major parties.

[CIB-173RDABN]

It’s one thing to rig a poll in one candidate’s favor when they are relatively even.

---

Voter fraud works best in local elections where one party has control over everything. It does not work so well for national election (which is why they want to get rid of the Electoral college).

[Mouton]

We have 20 to 30 not seeking re-election including Mark Meadows. I am concerned the commies could expand their margin.