To: SeekAndFind
In a Washington Post op-ed, he wrote that “the public has a right to observe a meaningful trial rather than simply learn that the result is a verdict of not guilty.” Whatever happened to the presumption of innocent until proved guilty????
9 posted on
12/19/2019 1:55:42 PM PST by
metmom
( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith...)
To: metmom
Sentence first, verdict afterwards. Straight out of the Looking Glass.
13 posted on
12/19/2019 1:57:20 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
To: metmom
-—“the public has a right to observe a meaningful trial rather than simply learn that the result is a verdict of not guilty.”——
This clown’s opinion of what he imagines the public has a right to, doesn’t trump the Constitution.
To: metmom
46 posted on
12/19/2019 3:04:49 PM PST by
EasySt
(Say not this is the truth, but so it seems to me to be, as I see this thing I think I see #KAG)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
